About the Author

Music Row Publisher David M. Ross has been covering the Nashville music industry for over 25 years.

Syntax Sucks2 StarsNot BadPretty GoodEnjoyed It! (3 votes, average: 3.33 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Labels: Set iTunes DRM-Free

iTunes_labelsUniversal, Warner Bros. and Sony BMG have been holding back DRM-free license approval from iTunes while extending that approval to Amazon.com and some other startups. Only EMI has offered its music in DRM-free, MP3 format to both vendors. This marketplace inequality appears to be a punitive measure against Apple, for refusing to agree to label demands for variable pricing and other issues. But if the license refusal is punitive, who is really getting hurt?

Let’s take a quick look. Which industry is choking on consolidation and shrinking sales? Which company has amassed a growing cadre of loyal consumers plus record earnings? Apple has demonstrated its digital marketing superiority over the record industry and its expertise should not be discounted. Also who was it that only a few years ago led the record labels out of a black hole where none of the music was being monetized and a whole generation of consumers was learning to get music for free?

Consumers are totally frustrated with DRM and its attached restrictions. They want music to be platform independent and play on all players. By not offering DRM-free music to iTunes which controls 70-75% of the market, labels are effectively further alienating consumers. It’s surprising that artists, managers and publishers, who are also hurt (much more than Apple) by this tactic haven’t risen up to complain to their respective labels. Labels should remember that consumers have legal and illegal choices when it comes to getting music. Denying the consumer at the largest store is a dangerous strategy, when FREE lurks everywhere; via e-mail, instant messenger, file sharing and CD burning, to name a few. Making it harder to get digital DRM-free music will ultimately sell less music.

If Apple refuses to comply with the label’s wishes there may be some compelling research to support its position. In any case, a punitive temper tantrum is counterproductive for everyone in the creative food chain and will result in selling less music. Universal, Warner Bros. and Sony BMG would be well advised to rethink the current DRM-free inequalities, focus on what makes economic sense for their companies and continue to argue differences with Apple on a merit, best-idea basis.

Tags: ,

RSS Feed for This Post3 Comment(s)

  1. Jim Foglesong | Jan 29, 2008 | Reply

    I feel sure that it is a little more complicated than a simple explanation; but, basically, David, I think you are right on. Has there ever been a business that can shoot itself in the foot more than the record business?

  2. Steve Meyer | Jan 30, 2008 | Reply

    David -

    Of course I agree with you 100% and I’ve been saying the exact same thing for some time in my newsletter.

    The labels hate iTunes, yet nobody did more to get people into the habit of BUYING music rather than stealing it, than Steve Jobs did. 3 billion plus songs sold on iTunes=3 billion less stolen.

    DRM is dead…the public spoke loud and clear,

    Steve Meyer
    President/CEO - Smart Marketing Consulting Services
    Publisher - DISC&DAT - A New Media Newsletter For The Music Industry
    Available at: http://www.freewebs.com/stevemeyer
    Editor, Digital Technology: http://www.allaccess.com
    Las Vegas, NV
    E-mail: stephennmeyer@earthlink.net

  3. Terry Stephens | Jan 30, 2008 | Reply

    From a publishing standpoint, I’m amazed that the record companies can’t see the need to get the most out of internet sales in any way possible. It’s the future of music sales, but they just can’t seem to accept that people are slowly losing interest in buying discs, cassettes etc. Ipods, mp3 players holding hundreds of songs fit in your shirt pocket. Wake up and get onboard guys.

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment